PHARNACES I OF PONTUS AND THE EXPANSIONIST POLICY ON THE BLACK SEA: DYNASTIC AMBITION, MARITIME STRATEGY, AND HELLENISTIC POWER POLITICS IN THE SECOND CENTURY BC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14795/jaha.13.2.2026.1477Keywords:
Pharnaces I, Kingdom of Pontus, Black Sea, Sinope, Pontic War, Chersonesus, Hellenistic diplomacy, Mithridatid dynastyAbstract
This article reassesses the expansionist foreign policy of Pharnaces I of Pontus (ca. 196–ca. 170 BC), arguing that his reign represents the definitive structural transformation of the Mithridatid state. While Pharnaces I is frequently eclipsed in scholarship by his grandson, Mithridates VI Eupator, this study contends that it was the former who pioneered a grand-scale Euxine strategy predicated upon three interlocking pillars.
First, the capture of Sinope (183 BC) is analyzed not merely as a territorial gain, but as a catalyst that transmuted a minor inland principality into a dominant maritime power with a 400-mile coastline. Second, the study demonstrates that the post-war northern strategy—anchored in the Chersonesus treaty (179 BC) and extended to Odessos and Mesambria—constituted a deliberate geopolitical reorientation that sustained Pontic policy for three generations. Third, the article challenges the traditional paradigm of perennial Pontic-Pergamene enmity, suggesting instead a nuanced diplomatic engagement with Rome from the reign’s inception.
By integrating a re-evaluation of the prevailing political conjuncture in Hellenistic Asia Minor, the paper concludes that Pharnaces I successfully exploited the post-Apamea power vacuum. Ultimately, it was his establishment of institutional, territorial, and ideological templates that provided the essential framework for the later Mithridatid challenge to Roman hegemony in the Hellenistic East.
Downloads
References
ALLEN 1983
Allen, R.E., The Attalid Kingdom: A Constitutional History (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
ARSLAN 2007
Arslan, M., Mithradates VI Eupator: Roma’nın Büyük Düşmanı (Istanbul: Odin).
AVRAM 2016
Avram, A., Sur la date du traité entre Pharnace et Chersonèse Taurique, Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne Supplement 16, 213–237.
BALLESTEROS-PASTOR 2000–2001
Ballesteros-Pastor, L., Pharnaces I of Pontus and the kingdom of Pergamum, Talanta 32–33, 61–66.
BALLESTEROS-PASTOR 2020
Ballesteros-Pastor, L., The origins of the Ariobarzanid dynasty, Gephyra 20, 61–78.
BALLESTEROS-PASTOR 2025
Ballesteros-Pastor, L., The reign of Pharnaces I. In: Barat, C. (ed.), Le Nord de l’Anatolie (Rennes: Presse Universitaire de Rennes), 223–235.
BÂRCĂ 2006
Bârcă, V., Nomazi ai stepelor. Sarmaţii timpurii în spaţiul nord-pontic (sec. II-I a. Chr.) (Cluj-Napoca: Argonaut).
BOSWORTH/WHEATLEY 1998
Bosworth, A.B./Wheatley, P.V., The origins of the Pontic house, Journal of Hellenic Studies 118, 155–164.
BURSTEIN 1980
Burstein, S., The aftermath of the peace of Apameia, American Journal of Ancient History 5, 1–12.
CALLATAŸ 2009
Callataÿ, F. de, The first royal coinages of Pontos. In: Højte, J.M. (ed.), Mithridates VI and the Pontic Kingdom (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press), 63–94.
FLEISCHER 2009
Fleischer, R., The rock-tombs of the Pontic kings in Amaseia. In: Højte, J.M. (ed.), Mithridates VI and the Pontic Kingdom (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press), 109–119.
GAJDUKEVIČ 1971
Gajdukevič, V.F., Das Bosporanische Reich (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag).
GALLO 2020
Gallo, L., The Pontic kingdom and the Black Sea, Il Mar Nero 10, 61–66.
GRAINGER 1997
Grainger, J.D., A Seleukid Prosopography and Gazetteer (Leiden: Brill).
GRIFFITH 1935
Griffith, G.T., The Mercenaries of the Hellenistic World (London: Cambridge University Press).
HABICHT 1956
Habicht, Chr., Über die Kriege zwischen Pergamon und Bithynia, Hermes 84, 90–110.
HABICHT 2006
Habicht, Chr., The Hellenistic Monarchies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
HANSEN 1971
Hansen, E.V., The Attalids of Pergamum. 2nd ed. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
HODDINOTT 1975
Hoddinott, R.F., Bulgaria in Antiquity (London: Ernest Benn).
HØJTE 2006
Højte, J.M., The date of the alliance between Chersonesos and Pharnakes. In: Stolba, V./Hannestad, L. (eds.), Chronologies of the Black Sea Area (Aarhus: Aarhus University), 137–152.
KINACI 2014
Kınacı, M., I. Pharnakes’in Pergamon Krallığı’na karşı savaşı, Cedrus 2, 203–223.
KINACI 2015
Kınacı, M., Antikçağda Pontos bölgesi’nin tarihsel coğrafyası, Cedrus 3, 181–229.
KINACI 2016
Kınacı, M., Mithradates Hanedanlığı’nda I. Pharnakes Dönemi (diss. Ankara Üniversitesi).
LESCHHORN 1993
Leschhorn, W., Antike Ären (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).
LORDKIPANIDZE 1983
Lordkipanidze, O.D., The Greco-Roman world and ancient Georgia, Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 67, 123–144.
LORDKIPANIDZE 2003
Lordkipanidze, O.D., Trade on the Black Sea. In: Faudot, M. (ed.), Pont-Euxin et Commerce (Besançon: Institut des Sciences et Techniques de l'Antiquité), 7–13.
MAGIE 1950
Magie, D., Roman Rule in Asia Minor. 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
MALAY 1992
Malay, H., Hellenistik Devirde Pergamon ve Aristonikos Ayaklanması (Izmir).
MAREK 2010
Marek, Chr., Geschichte Kleinasiens in der Antike (Darmstadt: C.H. Beck).
MCGING 1986a
McGing, B.C., The Foreign Policy of Mithridates VI Eupator King of Pontus (Leiden: Brill).
MCGING 1986b
McGing, B.C., The kings of Pontus: some problems of identity and date, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 129, 248–259.
MELLOR 1978
Mellor, R., The dedications on the Capitoline Hill, Chiron 8, 319–330.
NIESE 1963
Niese, B., Geschichte der Griechischen und Makedonischen Staaten. I–III (Darmstadt Gotha: Perthes).
OLSHAUSEN 1974
Olshausen, E., Zum Hellenisierungsprozess am Pontischen Königshof, Ancient Society 5, 153–170.
ROLLER 2020
Roller, D.W., Empire of the Black Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
ROSTOVTZEFF 1941
Rostovtzeff, M.I., The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World. I–III (Oxford: Clarendon
Press).
SAPRYKIN 1996
Saprykin, S.Yu., Pontijskoe Tsarstvo (Moscow: Nauka).
SAPRYKIN 2014
Saprykin, S.Yu., The Pontic proxenies, International Journal of Maritime History 26/2, 353–363.
SHERWIN-WHITE 1984
Sherwin-White, A.N., Roman Foreign Policy in the East 168 BC to AD 1 (London: Duckworth).
SÖKMEN 2005
Sökmen, E., Temple States of Pontus (diss. METU, Ankara).
STROBEL 1996
Strobel, K., Die Galater. Vol. I (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag).
TODUA 1990
Todua, T., Colchis in the System of the Kingdom of Pontus (Tbilisi).
TRACY 1992
Tracy, S.V., Inscriptiones Deliacae: IG XI 713 and IG II 1056, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung 107, 303–314.
TSETSKHLADZE 2000–2001
Tsetskhladze, G.R., Black Sea piracy, Talanta 32–33, 11–15.
WALBANK 1957
Walbank, F.W., A Historical Commentary on Polybius. Vol. I (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
WALBANK 1979
Walbank, F.W., A Historical Commentary on Polybius. Vol. III (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL OF ANCIENT HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, we use CC BY-NC-ND license (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs) wich only allowing others to download your works and share them with others as long as they credit you, but they can’t change them in any way or use them commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





